The Drop

The Drop

It stands poised in midair,

The drop from my reclusive pen…

It should let itself go,

Fall from grace, be bold,

Rage a storm, blow dust,

Lash everything in sight…

But, the soil isn’t ready,

It has crossed its arms,

The earth hides a weak heart,

Its mouth is not eager…

To swallow the blood

That will splatter its face

When the drop disintegrates

And sows wayward seeds

But, it thunders now and then

Lightning strikes in anticipation

The soil teases and churns

Soon, the drop will bite the dust

Inseminated, soaked to its bones,

Pregnant with unholy secrets

The soil will spring to life

And wanton blooms will streak it scarlet.

- Archana Pai Kulkarni

Much ado about a four-letter word

The first time my children chorused that the sambar I had cooked was really ‘sexy’, I took the new association between a laden word and the spicy concoction in my stride. The alliteration did it, methinks! Gradually, I realised that everything—just about everything—seemed ‘sexy’ to my children and they aren’t kindergarten tots; they know what the dictionary has to say about the word, and more, I presume. Clearly, the connotation of the word had evolved. Even when the children’s friends gathered at our home, I heard the word flying around casually. It wasn’t uttered in hushed tones. None of the gang seemed uncomfortable using it in my presence or thought they were being disrespectful. The controversial word had somewhere along, acquired an asexual personality. So, from “Hey, that’s a sexy top” to “I just finished reading I have a Dream. Sexy book!” to “Masala Magic has sexy corn cutlets” to “What a sexy room”, the word was thrown around nonchalantly, without the worry that it would raise my hackles. So, in its new, ubiquitous, multi-dimensional avatar, used to describe everything but women, it meant trendy, cool, beautiful, good, fantastic. However, Ms Sharma of the National Commission for Women (NCW) said at the seminar at Jaipur, that women should take the word positively, if someone compliments them. But, not every woman likes to be branded ‘sexy’, especially by a lascivious male whose intention is to convey that she is the answer to his bedroom fantasies. Eve-teasers and their ilk have a field day throwing the epithet, with lustful glee, at unsuspecting women. Also, every woman should reserve the right to either accept it as a compliment or feel affronted, depending on the occasion, the intention of the user, and who is paying courtesy. After all, it’s a volatile word! Rakhi Sawant or Poonam Pandey (with due respect to the ladies and their prerogative to choose their stance) may not object to being referred to as ‘sexy’ because it is their portrayal as desirable women that brings bread, butter and jam to their breakfast table. Both women have no qualms about projecting themselves as bold and covetable. Ditto with other Bollywood actresses—some of whom may be offended at being referred to in the same breath as the aforementioned twosome, as they project a different brand of ‘sexy’—but won’t take umbrage at being described as alluring to the opposite gender. But, try saying that to someone who’s just not interested in being a ‘sex symbol’ and you’ll have a situation on your hands. Imagine telling, say, Mamta Banerjee that you feel she’s a ‘sexy’ politician—‘sexy’ here meaning honest and efficient, no less! Her reaction could be nothing short of a political upheaval. Imagine the government being toppled by a four-letter word! You may say the problem is not with the word, but with the mindset. But, there are many, who will take the word at face value, refuse to acknowledge its tweaked character, and not without reason, given that it was originally used to objectify women and is still bandied occasionally to that end. Years ago, when Karisma Kapoor gyrated to the number ‘Sexy, sexy, sexy, mujhe log bole, the hit song from Khuddar, opportunists, social activists, feminists and a host of other people voiced their protests loudly, and subsequently, a tamer version, Baby, baby, baby...was produced to smooth ruffled feathers. I don’t know how many women were soothed by this version which infantilised them. Honestly, it’s Hobson’s choice between ‘baby’ and ‘sexy’ and being infantilised and objectified. As to whether Iwill take the word positively, as Ms Sharma suggests...well, it depends on whether I feel complimented or commoditised at that point of time. The context decides the overtones and the reaction. But, if you ask me about the weather now, I’ll say, “It’s sexy!” 

Shadows

It takes a while to shed my garb,

The nocturnal creature in me,

As I stride across the grey morning track.

The trees, comrades in arms, my witnesses,

Lean towards each other to whisper,

Their supine shadows holding hands.

As the sun breaks out on my forehead.

Dark half moons rise under my eyes.

Sleep has streaked my eyeballs crimson,

Curled my spidery hands into fists.

Fragments of my dreams incubate within.

My midnight stories crouch inside my palms,

A sliver of ecstasy is a thorn in my side

The one I slept on, with my back to the wall.

Stealthily, the jasmine flowers in my hair

Dawn settles softly around my irises

The ghouls stop digging their teeth into me.

Daylight is such a devil, it woos me.

I am a sunflower now, a young bud...

As my head turns, giddy and light,

I moult—my evening skin, a memory.

I laugh, as my shadows stalk me;

I know the trees will guard my secret.

-         Archana Pai Kulkarni

Today's confession:

CHANGING

I’m the bitch in the house,

Say my son, daughter and spouse.

My grumpy mornings and snappy days

Leave no room for defence.

I don’t choose to wake up

On the wrong side of my edgy bed.

Or determine the pace of my rabid strides.

Don’t hold me culpable for my hissing room,

Or the rancid smells permeating my hearth.

Don’t condemn me for my hot breath

Or deride me for my defiant gait.

Truly, I was never a candidate for mutinies.

I didn’t prod the canine in me

Or enroll to learn to snarl. 

It was you…

The seasons changed, the tides turned.

I have stopped taking the garbage out,

I have stopped cooking five-course meals,

I have given up waving white flags.

I refuse to perform on demand.

As I hum a tremulous tune,

My nonchalance a façade,

I sip my wicked coffee

With a deliberate air of calm,

And notice with a shudder

That I don’t apologise or grovel anymore;

But, it doesn’t hurt me any less when I bite.

- Archana Pai Kulkarni

How I Steal Time

Time Thieving

No one gives a woman time,

She has to grab him by its neck,

Her shy, withdrawn lover,

Pin him down mercilessly,

Claim him as her own,

Throw her weight and sit on him,

Wrench him away from the hob,

Pull him from under the grinding stone,

Rescue him from wailing children,

Gather him from dusty corners…

Lest his elusive legs

Go wandering again

Out of sheer habit

To lands embroiled in drudgery,

Places best forgotten for a while

And kept aside, concealed,

Till she’s waltzed with her reluctant slave

Kissed, embraced and made love to him

To her heart’s content.

When he deserts her,

As is his wont,

Her short-lived dalliance

With her visiting lover

Won’t leave her heart-broken.

He’s made her a crafty robber.

She’ll leave her door open,

Wait with hot, bated breath,

Wide open arms, fresh memories

A sedulous woman

Who’s tasted sweet blood,

And she’ll go prowling again.

- Archana Pai Kulkarni

What if I Lost It All

The other day, I was returning home in a cab from work when a TMT bus, a veritable sardine can on wheels, parked itself alongside, at a signal that had just turned red. Speeding as it was on a crater-filled road that also threw up dust and cement from the flyover construction site nearby, it almost nose-dived before it stopped with a forceful jerk. All the commuters—those sitting uncomfortably in their seats and those standing with their bodies glued together by the sweat and  grime of a day’s work—were first pushed violently forward, then backward and forward again, before they could steady themselves and untwist their twisted arms that held on for dear life to coiled, worn-out handles. Next, I heard some expletives fly out above the blaring horns, screeching tyres and racing motors. The bus looked angry as people gathered themselves after disentangling their bodies from the mass of limbs that had flailed about when the bus driver had braked abruptly.

I have seen crowded buses before but this one looked like no air could circulate inside it. Though I was comfortably ensconced in the cab, I started feeling asphyxiated and claustrophobic. Gratitude filled my heart. I was privileged. I wasn’t in that bus trying hard to breathe. The forces that create us had been kind to me. ‘What if?’ I thought, as a chill ran down my spine, all that I have taken for granted vanished overnight? What if I had no car, no money to travel by cab, no roof over my head, nothing? What would I do? Suddenly, nothing felt permanent—not my clothes, my books, my little desk at home, my job, the plants I watered every morning, the people in my life, the buildings, the park, the bank accounts, the pan card, the passport, the cheque book, the travel plans, the vision board, the dreams! I shuddered!

What would I do?” Where would I go? What would I have? The sky would hopefully not turn its back on me. The sun would rise and set. The moon would flood the nights with silver light and stars would twinkle. I could take these for granted. Well, maybe. My fears made me doubt even that which seemed to have always been around and seems eternal. Love would still cause heartburn, longing and all the bitter-sweet things love does. I imagined myself standing under the azure sky, looking upward, all alone, wondering which direction to take. I pictured myself in the wilderness. Long stretches of land, wildly green, sullen brown and grey and orange. It terrified me. It liberated me. It deposited me into a fantastic world where anything was possible and everything was, at the same time, so dangerously adventurous! Would I be able to live without my Blackberry and vada paav and hot running water and a clean loo? If there was a way in which I could find out without it ever happening, I’d love to take a walk in the wilderness.  

Shoe Bite and Walking Light

Someone stole my walking shoes last week. I am no Imelda Marcos. I owned just one sturdy pair. The Nike pair had supported me all through my arduous journey of knocking off a few pounds. I loved them. They had witnessed my agony and the pain in my calves as I increased my speed and then the distance and then the duration of my brisk walks. They didn't bite me either. They gave me my space. Toe room, to be precise. I was distressed. Who could have stolen a weathered, well-worn pair of shoes, on the eve of the New Year? As far as I knew, it certainly wasn't any of my neighbours. Most of them have fancier pairs. Our building boasts of tight security. So, it couldn't be an outsider. "Was it someone with a fetish for women's shoes?" my wild imagination asked. Whosoever it was, the shoe thief managed to make me more resolute about re-starting my walking regimen, which had been truncated a few months back, because of fresh domestic challenges.
I discovered the theft on December 30. First, I looked frantically for my stolen pair in all the places that I may have left them (I still couldn't come to terms with the fact that someone had stolen my lifeline). Once I was convinced that there had indeed been a thief on the prowl, I sat silently and mourned for my departed pal. The bigger issue was that starting my walking regimen from the first day of the New Year was my topmost resolution and it was broken even before I attempted to honour it. People walk—in chappals, sandals, stilettos, wedges and all types of footwear. They are the brave ones. I need my shoes. For spinal and moral support. I was mortified that I wouldn't find the time to buy a new pair before January 2012 arrived. My worst fears were confirmed, when I reached home from work, way past 9.30 pm. on the 31st. Woe was me! But, I was determined that I would be out at the crack of dawn, 5.30 am to be precise, and walk, come what may. I examined the four pairs of footwear I own. Though they are sensible, functional pairs, they didn't look like they'd last the assault on their being of a 50-minute brisk, purposeful walk. I needed a pair of walking shoes urgently.
As I racked my brain to think of a source, I saw my daughter's er... soiled pair sitting desolately on the shoe shelf. It had obviously not seen the outdoors for a long time. That we wear the same shoe size was a blessing. Never have I exulted at the sight of a pair of shoes, not even at annual sales that sell the best of designer brands for half the price, as I did then.

At the crack of dawn, when the world slept and the rest nursed a hangover, I walked for a good hour in borrowed shoes. It felt awkward at first. As if my feet didn't belong in them. Then, the nip in the air grazed my skin lightly. I shivered a bit but. Fresh air hit my nostrils. It felt good. I had begun the New Year on a rejuvenating note. But, my woes were not over. While the walk revved up my blood circulation and added roses to my cheeks, the shoes were unfriendly. They bit my toes with a vengeance and were decidedly uncooperative, as much as they could be on knowing that a stranger was wearing them. I still have the shoe-bites on my toes but now, I have a bright new pair of Reeboks, in white and lime green.
They are a snug fit. I haven't walked in them yet, but something tells me that they will share my new journey towards fitness. Also, I'm taking no chances with them. They are hidden away in a dark corner of the lowest shelf in the shoe cabinet. Away from prying eyes. I'm sure nobody will make the effort to bend down to fish them out. For now, I'm set. With Bandaid, a soft pair of socks and some grit. I love the lightness of being coming my way.

From South Mumbai to Virar, the mini rages

My response to the outrageous article in First Post:

http://www.firstpost.com/living/its-not-about-the-right-to-wear-but-the-right-thing-to-do-170902.html

If a person from Virar shifts to Bandra, will there be a paradigm shift in his outlook? What is appropriate or right is surely relative, born out of conditioning, the way we are brought up, the mores in the type of social set-up in which we move? Is the author then suggesting that a girl in a mini-skirt is more likely to be raped in Virar than in South Mumbai, because the outrage generates lust? Should she stick to wearing mini-skirts only in South Mumbai? Also, is the male libido more in control in South Mumbai than it is in Jogeshwari? Do we have statistics to support that supposition? What happens if a potential rapist from, say, Jogeshwari East travels to South Mumbai? Will his mindset change just because he's in a place where minis are a norm? Is it kosher for such a man to unleash his libido on a mini-skirt sporting girl on his home-ground? Do we then conclude that because wearing mini-skirts is scandalous in these god-knows-why-they've-been-chosen-as-examples suburbs, the chances of rape in these areas will be high and even justified? Are incidences of rape actually higher in 'such' areas? Statistics, someone? Should women who want to wear miniskirts shift to South Mumbai and assume that men from Jogeshwari will not follow suit? What should be the desirable length of the mini-skirt? How many inches above the knee will the Jogeshwari resident find appropriate? Do all Jogeshwari residents think alike? Or will there be differences among them regarding the length of the skirt and its appropriateness? How about our very traditional Indian sari worn five inches below the navel, with a blouse that exposes almost all of the back? Is that not provocative, because it's traditional and Indian? So, do Indian men from the suburbs think of women in western clothes as objects and therefore, fit for rape?  I think the author should walk the by-lanes of Jogeshwari and Virar and see for himself the huge number of women sporting the sari in a bold avatar. Is the author from South Mumbai or Virar? I ask because his own reaction will depend upon where he lives, right? Are education, awareness and a broadening of outlook are unheard of? Does the writer have a dress code for men too, both from South Mumbai and Virar? Is it okay for a Virar guy to wear a 'banian' and shorts in public? It must be. After all, women are not given to prescribing dress codes for men. They have better things to do. And they wouldn't dream of raping the man, whatever he wears. So, it's not the mini that needs to be restrained, it is the wild, uncouth male libido and the objectification of women—whether we are in South Mumbai or Virar. Get it? 

And the afterthought: Did you need a picture of a girl in a mini skirt to illustrate this obnoxious piece of writing? Where was this picture taken? Virar or South Mumbai? People, react according to the place you live in. Will this photograph be seen by men in Virar too? Tsk...tsk... Now what?

Really, how ridiculous can people get?